New Materialisms SIG: Ethics in/with classrooms, comics & computers

New Materialisms SIG: Ethics in/with classrooms, comics & computers. Bicycles Create Change.com 4th August 2021.

For our August New Materialisms SIG, we were delighted to have Dr. Theresa Ashford (USC) share some of her current NM research considerations, thoughts and processes.

In this session, we explored how ethics feature in New Materialisms research.

NM Session: Ethics in/with classrooms, comics and computers.

This session explores the idea of New Materialisms and ethics. This is a tricky space that tests emergence and experience. In this session, Theresa used several key papers as a way to continue working-with how to pull these aspects together in some (in)comprehensible form.  

Bio: Dr. Theresa Ashford is a Geography and Sustainability Lecturer in the School of Law and Society (USC). Her key interest is investigating human-non human ethics and responsibility – response(ability) in the world.  Her undergraduate and postgraduate education is in Geography and spans physical and human geography domains. She has worked in the regional planning field in Canada and her Masters research explored the use and role of public spaces in the support and co-construction of homeless punk youth identities in Winnipeg, Canada. Dr. Ashford’s Ph.D. research (2018, Education, UQ) used Actor-network theory to investigate the emergence of digital ethics in 1:1 classrooms and the active role of technology mediating, supporting, and translating human behaviour and understandings.

Some of Theresa’s recent publications (see below) we discussed were App-Centric students and academic Integrity: A proposal for assembling socio-technical responsibility and her awesome article on Wonder Woman: An assemblage of complete virtue packed in a tight swimsuit.

New Materialisms SIG: Ethics in/with classrooms, comics & computers. Bicycles Create Change.com 4th August 2021.
NM SIG August meeting provocation

What we did

In this session, Theresa deep-dived into Ethics and how it has been bubbling up in her work wide-ranging research.

Theresa set the ethical scene and outlined the Artistolian entry point she was using to discuss ethics.

She then led us through a series of ‘searching for ethics in awkward places’.

Theresa used the metaphor of a ‘Mud Map’ to introduce herself and establish how her background as a human geographer and teacher informs her concerns for the state of inequity in the world and across human-nonhuman spheres of doing. She also outlined her particular interest in phronesis (practical wisdom informed by a sound understanding of ethics, the world and humans), and how she uses Aristotelian means to navigate the excesses and deficits in life and theoretical applications in the world.

We then turned to (Bruno) Latour, ethics and technology.

Theresa spoke of the New Materialisms tenets of decentring anthropocentrism, reconfiguring subjectivity, and elevating the role of non-human actors.

She problematized this type of ‘rethinking’ as it extends to sources of ethics – to the extent of which she argued, could be considered a ‘breaking point’.

Her discussion of increasing sensitivity to fragility (Jonas, 1981) and how New Materialisms celebrates materiality in its “surprises, noise and remainders” (Connolly, 2013) resonated strongly with me and my current bikes-for education research project.

Theresa also spoke about the cultivation of ethics grounded in care for the world. Here, we were provoked to consider how we enact and perform care (recognizing it is a network effect) what is derived in a positive ethos and practices of cultivation (requires awareness/wisdom), ideas on care in the human estate – and our “manifold entanglements” with non-human, and how we might reorient ourselves profoundly in relation to the world, to one another and to ourselves (Coole & Fox, 2010) and bioethics.

New Materialisms SIG: Ethics in/with classrooms, comics & computers. Bicycles Create Change.com 4th August 2021.
Collaborative NM SIG word association

There are four main NM streams (see here for more on this). I sit with the feminist New Materialists within the Baradian tradition, so it was really enjoyable to learn more about the Latourian approaches to New Materialisms, such as how ANT:

  • Sees technology as a mode of existence (exploring existence and being)
  • Technology as ‘fold’ –  time, space and actants – it keeps folded heterogeneous temporalities (materials, modes, memories, mobilities)
  • Technology extends potentialies unrealisable without its presence
  • Affordance – schemes of action – permission and promise – a new entity together
  • Tech mediation – inadequately captures the new possibilities created

Teresa used three data vignettes from her research (a school daily internet bandwidth usage, Women Woman Stuff, and student-Apps), to highlight some of the ethical sticky points and moments of insight that come from looking at these educational situations from an Ethics and ANT New Materialisms POV.

After this incredible presentation, we had a lively Q & A and an open forum to unpack some of these vexing and encouraging connections between ethics and New Materialisms.

Below are a few ideas from Dr. Ashford’s presentation. I’ve deliberately not included the full PPT to respect and protect Dr. Ashford’s intellectual property and current research.

It was an exciting, robust, and thought-provoking session – so much to think and talk about!

A massive thanks to Theresa for sharing her ideas and experiences so generously.

  • New Materialisms SIG: Ethics in/with classrooms, comics & computers. Bicycles Create Change.com 4th August 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG: Ethics in/with classrooms, comics & computers. Bicycles Create Change.com 4th August 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG: Ethics in/with classrooms, comics & computers. Bicycles Create Change.com 4th August 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG: Ethics in/with classrooms, comics & computers. Bicycles Create Change.com 4th August 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG: Ethics in/with classrooms, comics & computers. Bicycles Create Change.com 4th August 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG: Ethics in/with classrooms, comics & computers. Bicycles Create Change.com 4th August 2021.


Theresa’s Publications

Ashford, T., & Curtis, N. (2020). Wonder woman: An assemblage of complete virtue packed in a tight swimsuit. Law, Technology and Humans, 2(2), 185-197. doi: 10.5204/lthj.1593

Ashford, T. (2021). App-centric students and academic integrity: A proposal for assembling socio-technical responsibility. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(1), 35-48. doi: 10.1007/s10805-020-09387-w

Readings

Blackman, T. (2020). Experiences of vulnerability in poverty education settings: developing reflexive ethical praxis. Postcolonial Directions in Education, 9(2) 198-225.

Waelbers, K., & Dorestewitz, P. (2014). Ethics in Actor Networks, or: What Latour Could Learn from Darwin and Dewey. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20, 23-40, doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9408-1


All images from Dr. Ashford’s presentation (attributed in-text) unless otherwise specified.

Visible & Valued: (In)Citing Feminist Scholarship

Visible & Valued: (In)Citing Feminist Scholarship. Bicycles Create Change.com. 4th  July 2021.

As well as the erasure of other-than-European contributions within research, I am concerned about the (in)visibility and (de)valuing of female scholarship.

My current research into how bicycles feature in West African girls’ access to education has a strong gender theme – and I read a lot.

Who is writing about West African female experiences is revealing. It is difficult to find literature on this topic written by African scholars – and even less so, work by female African scholars and knowledge holders.

Overwhelmingly, work in this area is by white, European males.

But this dynamic is not exclusive to my field of interest.

Female authorship has always been under-represented – in all fields.

There is historical and current systematic bias in scientific information production and recognition for male scholar-authors, (Mathew Effect), while in comparison, female scholarship is still often ignored, denied credit or goes largely unrecognised (Matilda Effect).

The fact that female scholarly impact is under-appreciated is not new.

And this dynamic impacts men as well as women. Feminist scholars have been writing about this issue for decades. There are many reasons for why this is, including some lesser known implications – such as the fact that male academic authors self-cite 70% more than female authors and that when some women researchers adopt birth name AS middle name or birth name-married name variations professionally, this practice has been shown to have a detrimental impact on the dissemination, publication and citation of their work.

And this is not only an academic issue. There are many international movements working to redress the erasure of women’s current and historical contributions – take Women’s History Month or the WikProject Women as examples.

I was recently invited to join a feminist Reading with Reciprocity project.

The Reading with Reciprocity invite was the perfect opportunity to put into action more publicly, some In(Citing) experiments I’ve been working-with exploring how I might better support, promote and recognise female scholarship in my work.

Visible & Valued: (In)Citing Feminist Scholarship. Bicycles Create Change.com. 4th July 2021.
Image: Andrea Piacquadio

Two approaches to (In)Citing Feminist Scholarship

In my book response (forthcoming – I will link here when made public), I used two approaches to make academic female contributions more visible.

1. Including first and surnames for in-text citations

First, I included the first and surname for all female (and other) scholars cited.

Historically, the academic writing-citing convention is to only cite surnames. It looks like this:

Dunne (2018) ………

or

..………….(Dunne, 2018).

However this is problematic from a feminist POV given that surnames are patrilineal – bestowed either at birth (automatically deferring to the father’s surname) or through marriage (assuming the husband’s surname).

With no first name to distinguish otherwise, absolute supremacy of male linage and masculine privilege is reinscribed and unchallenged. So, I include the first name of female authors to destablise this conventional and draw attention to, identify and validate – female author within the male (sur)name convention.

This works best for author-prominent citations.

So my citations then looked more like this:

Glenda Dunne (2018) …..

or

……… (Glenda Dunne, 2018).

2. Include the academic position of female author-scholars

I also included the current academic position of the female scholars cited, not just the honorific “Dr.” as is convention.

Female scholars are far less likely to be called ‘Dr’ or have ‘Dr’ attributed to their name, or they are not taken seriously or even mocked when they do, whereas it is unquestionably applied for males in a similar situation.

“Dr.” is an educational qualification for people conferred with a PhD or doctorate, whereas Assistant Professor or Professor is an academic position grade within the academy – it denotes authority, seniority and status.

Far too often, women are note recognised in attaining the academic standing they have.

So, to counter this, instead of:

In this book, Dunne (2018) explores

or

In this book , Dr Dunne (2018) explores..

My work started to integrate something more like this:

In this book, Prof. Dunne (2018) explores..

So now, I try to use more author-prominent in-text citations so I can apply first AND surname (see above) AS WELL AS deliberately insert the academic position of the author.

So now my citations look like this:

In this book, Prof. Glenda Dunne (2018) explores ...

This is definitely an unconventional move.

Academic positions can change if the person assumes a new roles or moves universities. ‘Dr.’ always stay the same (if given at all) no matter where you go, so that is the conventional default honorific.

This meant I had to do a little more research.

I had to look up the scholar and double check each female scholar’s current position for accuracy.

This additional ‘work’ helped keep me accountable to the feminist imperative of going the extra mile to learn more about the women scholars I was investigating and is a good reminder to be accurate and ethical in my representation of them.

I include the author’s academic titles as a deliberate push to draw attention to the advanced positions the female academics cited/referred to have achieved through expertise, knowledge and research. The title of Dr is not adequately meritous for such positions.

This is something I have been doing for a while in my academic work (like publications), but I am usually told to revert back to Dr or remove all honorifics.

(Note: I was asked by the editors of the feminist project I was writing for to add a (foot)note explaining to readers the reasoning for using these approaches as part of my final book response release.)

Else where in my workshops, Teaching and Learning sessions, and on this blog I have progressively been using this approach as my default – see for example: A/P Chelsea Bond BAM! on World Bicycle Day post.

And I will I continue to apply these (In)Citing techniques where ever possible.

My execution of these two approaches maybe a little clunky at times, but that is also because we (are all) so (un)used to a particular type of (In)Citing!

This experiment is also a long-term commitment… and a process – one that will no doubt change, morph, stumble, be updated and tuned up as my feminist engagement, ideas and experience flexes and fades, and expands and contracts.

For me, it is the engaging-experimenting-doing of feminist imperatives differently (such as greater reciprocity and visibility for female scholarship) that is most interesting in this endeavour.

Read well and cite well, friends!

Worlding: Geotracing Data Flavours

Worlding: Geotracing Data Flavours. Bicycles Create Change.com. 23rd June 2021.
Image: REX WAY

It has been a very strange two weeks. I’ve tried to keep quiet and focused: thinking, writing, researching and working. I continue to learn a lot. Every day, I have my mind stretched and pulled in new and provocative ways – here’s a recent example in 100 words.

Geotracing Data Flavours

It’s been a busy week. Guarding alpacas and reading mushrooms. Being caught in a self-important fray with Cynosura. Tangling cosmologies with interrupted futurities to form bubbles that pop and fizzle and boil. Embroiled in sometimes clunky-relations that rely on motley sources. Summer’s easy riches buoyed by interludes of precarity and irregularity. Data flavours explode on hungry tongues, then blow down empty academic hallways, alone and unwanted. Visiting human-disturbed environments, ideas and bodies. (R)Evolutions patchy mimicry. Geotracing daunting resources that nurture the most private sensibilities and desires. And all the while, inhabiting moments speckled with capitalism, shamanism, and wild women.

New Materialisms and Mountain Bike Trails

New Materialisms and Mountain Bike Trails. Bicycles Create Change.com. 4th June 2021.

Being a posthumanist, embodied researcher means that I think and do things a little differently from mainstream ‘traditional’ researchers. But I am not the only posthumanist researcher.

It is very exciting to see increasing more scholars thinking, doing and writing posthumanism project.

My work comes under Posthumanism and more specifically New Materialisms.

New Materialisms has four main ‘streams’

  • Speculative Realism
  • Object Oriented Ontology (known as OOO)
  • Actor Network Theory (known as ANT)
  • Feminist New Materialisms

My Feminist New Materialisms project puts to work Quantum Physicist’s Karen Barad’s Agential Realism.

Each of the New Materialisms streams have different approaches, but overall agree on:

  1. A return to matter and an emphasis on performativity as an appropriate way to return
  2. A new (flat) ontology or theory of being
  3. Focus on and redefinition of agency
  4. Critical or subversive orientation
  5. A related interest in the posthuman and non-human

…which means I get to read some pretty weird and wacky stuff!

…and I love it!

I have seen a couple of bicycle-focused New Materialisms project. Its not surprising given the ubiquitous and beloved role bicycles have in the world – and it is an understandable fit for active people who work with more-than-human bodies-matter… in this case bicycles!

New Materialisms and Mountain Bike Trails. Bicycles Create Change.com. 4th June 2021.

Dr. Jim Cherrington: New Materialisms & MTB trails

What is super excited to see – are the new and interesting variations beyond the bike, that bike-obsessed New Materialists are now working on… and a great example of this is Dr Jim Cherrington’s work. Jim is a Senior Lecturer at the Academy of Sport and Physical Activity in the Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, UK.

Jim’s work applies New Materialisms to look at mountain bike trails differently.

I know this kind of work is not for everyone…and you can call me an academic geek… but… I think this is awesome! Why? well..because it ….

  • Embraces the five tenets of NM
  • Further cements bikes (and all things biking) as a serious focus of empirical study
  • Is not urban or ‘cycling’ focused as most other NM+bike projects are (not me and not Jim!)
  • Expands biking scholarship – ie another bike-obsessed NM researcher.
  • Working on a topic most others overlook
  • Bringing attention and interest to MTB
  • Has a regular co-writer/partner and as a team they are prolific
  • Applies different NM approaches/theories and explains how they feature in different bike riding encounters

….to name a few!

So interesting and so timely

This week I have been working on my data analysis and thinking-writing about the agency of the dirt on rural African school trails – so Jim’s work is a welcome and opportune find.

Below I’ve included three of Jim’s NM mountain biking articles (the last two are written with coauthor John Black).

Warning: Can be a little dense for the uninitiated – theory and jargon heavy in places.

For quick reference, I’ve posted the abstract below or download the full article.

Enjoy!

The Ontopolitics of Mountain Bike Trail Building: Addressing Issues of Access and Conflict in the More-than-Human English Countryside.

In recent years there have been calls for scholars working within sport and physical culture to recognise the (increasing) confluence of nature and culture. Situated within an emerging body of new materialist research, such accounts have shown how various activities are polluted by, fused to, and assembled with nonhuman entities. However, more work is needed on the political possibilities afforded by nonhuman agency, and by extension, the stakes that such flat ontological arrangements might raise the management and governance of physical culture.

Building on research conducted with mountain bike trail builders, this paper seeks to explore what it means to know, to be and to govern a human subject in the Anthropocene. Specifically, I draw on Ash’s (2019) post-phenomenological theory of space and Chandler’s (2018) notion of onto-political hacking to show how the playful, contingent and transformative practices of the mountain bike assemblage confront the linear and calculated governance of the English countryside. In doing so, mountain bike trails are positioned as objects of hope that allows for a collective re-imagining of political democracy in a more-than-human landscape.

Cherrington, J. (2021). The Ontopolitics of Mountain Bike Trail Building: Addressing Issues of Access and Conflict in the More-than-Human English Countryside. Somatechnics.

Mountain bike trail building, “dirty” work, and a new terrestrial politics.

Dirt is evoked to signify many important facets of mountain bike culture, including its emergence, history, and everyday forms of practice and affect. These significations are also drawn on to frame the sport’s (sub)cultural and counterideological affiliations. In this article we examine how both the practice of mountain biking and, specifically, mountain bike trail building, raises questions over the object and latent function of dirt, hinting at the way that abjection can, under certain circumstances, be a source of intrigue and pleasure. In doing so, we suggest a resymbolization of our relationship with dirt via a consideration of the terrestrial.

Cherrington, J., & Black, J. (2020). Mountain bike trail building, “dirty” work, and a new terrestrial politics. World Futures, 76(1), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2019.1698234

Spectres of Nature in the Trail Building Assemblage.


Through research that was conducted with mountain bike trail builders, this article explores the processes by which socio-natures or ‘emergent ecologies’ are formed through the assemblage of trail building, mountain bike riding and matter. In moving conversations about ‘Nature’ beyond essentialist readings and dualistic thinking, we consider how ecological sensibilities are reflected in the complex, lived realities of the trail building community.

Specifically, we draw on Morton’s (2017) notion of the ‘symbiotic real’ to examine how participants connect with a range of objects and non-humans, revealing a ‘spectral’ existence in which they take pleasure in building material features that are only partially of their creation. Such ‘tuning’ to the symbiotic real was manifest in the ongoing battle that the trail builders maintained with water. This battle not only emphasized the fragility of their trail construction but also the temporal significance of the environments that these creations were rendered in/with.

In conclusion, we argue that these findings present an ecological awareness that views nature as neither static, inert or fixed, but instead, as a temporal ‘nowness’, formed from the ambiguity of being in and with nature. Ecologically, this provides a unique form of orientation that re-establishes the ambiguity between humans and nature, without privileging the former. It is set against this ecological (un)awareness that we believe a re-orientation can be made to our understandings of leisure, the Anthropocene and the nature-culture dyad.

Cherrington, J., & Black, J. (2020). Spectres of nature in the trail building assemblage. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure, 3(1), 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41978-019-00048-w

New Materialisms SIG: The disruptive effects and affects of COVID-19

For this month’s NM SIG meeting, we are putting to work New Materialisms differently. We are using NM to consider more deeply some of the wider and pressing current affairs and social movements of our day. There is much happening locally and globally that is troubling and significant – and these dynamics demand our attention and engagement as compassionate human beings, community members, ethical researchers, and citizens of the world.

So we are taking some time to check-in and think-with some of the current ‘big themes, events and issues’ in the news and media, in particular:

  • Women’s issues/rights and recent protests
  • COVID-19
  • Climate Change

…and to consider the human and non-human aspects of current events/news to tease out the ways these issues are entangled. 

These are important issues I am passionate about and have previously posted, published and hit the streets for – like Encountering the Return, or Brisbane’s Climate Action Rally or the more recent Women’s March4Justice – Brisbane and reclaiming darkly pathways on the UN Day of Forests.

The highlight of this meeting is an interview with Dr. Adele Pavlidis – where we chat about a recent paper she co-wrote with Prof. Simone Fullagar that took an NM lens to the early days of COVID.

We also invited members to bring ideas about these current social issues with the purpose of linking them to our research.

New Materialisms SIG: The disruptive effects and affects of COVID-19. Bicycles Create Change.com. 22nd May 2021.
Image: Lisanto

The Interview

Thinking through the disruptive effects and affects of COVID-19 with feminist New Materialisms

Dr. Adele Pavlidis is a Senior Lecturer at Griffith University. She is a social scientist and writer who draws on a range of methods to better understand the world we live in. Her work examines the ways sport and leisure can be understood as spaces of transformation and ‘becoming’. Influenced by Deleuze and Guattari, Irigaray, and contemporary feminist writing on affect (Probyn, Ahmed, Blackman and others), Adele’s intellectual concern is with the possibility of a feminine cultural imaginary and a future open to possibility.

What happened in this meeting?

We had a great time! Lots of generative discussions.

New Materialisms SIG: The disruptive effects and affects of COVID-19. Bicycles Create Change.com. 22nd May 2021.

Below are two 100-word worldlings I wrote as a summary of: 1) the interview and 2) the subsequent discussion.

Excavating the ‘no global’.

Thinking-with Adele’s disruptive effects and affects of COVID-19 and ‘the women’s problem’. Relationships between price, value and ‘what you get’ in (re)turn and environment. Quality, care, potentiality, privacy and openness. There is nothing wrong with being angry. Privileged intersections: Instagram’s ‘Advanced Style’ sans @suekreitzman. Loving the multiscalar. Considering Janelle Knox-Hayes’ ‘value of markets’ and the time-space sociomateriality of organisations and natural environments. There is no such thing as ‘the global’. Theresa’s feeling that this thinking is like GIS – layering data on top of each other, then exploring the multi-lens/scale mess reminds me of Karen Barad’s ‘stratification’. Purposefully ‘plugging in’.

Climate change inequities.

Climate change is a product of inequality. If we look at inequality as a practice that is connecting us or an outcome of/or a network of relations… or as predetermined/context/flows…. response-ability… can we flip inequality? What about inequality as something we are responsible for? Colonialism and modern economies of slavery. Emma Dabiri says Do not touch my hair and has great suggestions for What white people can do next – moving from allyship to coalition. Making visible individual actions and larger structures that remove agency.  Moving to individual actuals as objects of inequalities. Challenging amnesias and re-collecting Feminist New Materialisms elsewhere.

New Materialisms SIG: The disruptive effects and affects of COVID-19. Bicycles Create Change.com. 22nd May 2021.

Resources

For this meeting, we suggested the below resources to get the juices flowing.

Mother’s Day: Give more thoughtful presence and presents (Disruptive Edit)

Mother's Day: Give more thoughtful presence and presents. Bicycles Create Change.com. 12th May 2021.
Image: Annie Spratt

Dear Reader. If this is your first time on this blog – it is best not to start with the post below. This post is a disruptive edit expert-iment that begins ‘in the middle’. It will not make much sense if you’ve not seen some of my previous posts. Some of these posts (like the Geography and Collective Memories post – which you should check out) are getting increasingly ‘loose’ and ‘messy’ and working with ‘in-progress’ sensemaking – thus leading into more disruptive edits like this one. If you are new, perhaps start with the ‘clean and tidy’ version of this post – it is called Mother’s Day 2021 and is the precursor-basis for the exploration below.

If you are up for something different, read on!

*NB: this post is best read on a desktop – might be a little (more) odd if on a mobile device*

This post is not what it seems…well…. it is… and it isn’t.

What started out as a ‘normal’ post morphed into something else. Usually, blog posts are straightforward: informative, factual, opinion, or instructional. While I was writing on the topic ‘Mothers Day’ for this post – disruptive ideas and opportunities emerged. So… instead of ignoring or disregarding them, I embraced them. You could say this was also an experiment in applying diffraction thinking-doing (my theoretical approach I am using for my PhD) to other-than academic writing. This is new territory for me (to write) and for you (to read). What diffraction writing means here, is that instead of only sharing the usual polished final blog post, I’ve experimented with folded into the blog post my thinking-process-editing as I am writing it – a kind of disruptive writing-with blog post process. It might be a little weird and may or may not work. there will be typos and mistakes – some parts will just be notes or ‘snaps’ – resist the urge to edit for ‘correctness’. But I like the idea of doing something new and challenging what I think writing, especially such public writing! is or should be, going ‘beyond’, and being (more publicly) transparent with writing-as-process expert-iments . To try and show how this is working, the blog post content is in black text and the process content is in superscript like this . It would be easier to do this in a word document with track change comments which I have included below as a file for those interested in seeing it, but the here challenge is to see how it works within the functionality of a Word Press.org blog post.

We’ll see how it goes. Good luck to us all! NG.

Insert image of mum. Use creative commons to support alt artists. Attribute/link to promote photographer – preferably female. Use an image of other-than mainstream blond mum stereotype (in this case a redhead!) = have some sort of diversity to show a greater range of mums (blond mums already have a strong presence and representation online). See ‘undisrupted’ version of this post for alt (M)othering image

Mother’s Day: Give more thoughtful presence and presents

8th May is Mother’s Day.

Happy Mother’s Day mums – and dads and significant others and carers who also fill maternal roles. Dads and other/carers: I added this is it did not feel right to only single out ‘mums’ as there are many ‘others’ who are not officially a’ mother’ – yet who equally fulfil a similar role. A homage to my commitment to better recognizing the fluid and diverse experiences of what ‘mothering’ is – and I was raised by my father who was a consummate ‘mother’ and father and many other things…

For a previous Mother’s Day, I wrote about the issues I had with some Mother’s Day ‘suggested gifts for cycling mums’.

If you haven’t read my post Happy Fearful Mother’s Day Cycling Mums! check it out here – it’s well worth the read! Internal Hyperlink: I link back to my own blog to promote past writing and keep readership ‘inside’ my website where – also helped remind me of the amount of work I have already done and share from the archives … I LOVE the image I sourced for this hyperlinked post

I appreciate the sentiment of Mother’s Day (and Father’s Day) in taking time to recognise and celebrate the input and work mums do. I didn’t want this post to be ‘too negative’ or ‘down with Mum’s day’ – that’s not what I think or mean – I wanted some balance and make sure I acknowledge the positives of Mother’s Day.

I like to think that mums are always appreciated as they are on Mother’s Day (ie for the other 364 days of the year as well) – not just one day a year … anyhoo…

Mums have it especially? tough.                                                                                                   

Women are advantaged in society and mothers in particular face enduring and unfair social and corporate pressures and constraints around childcare, unpaid labour, taking the load for emotional labour (the unpaid job men still don’t understand) and ‘being a good mother’, inequitable divisions of household labour, the hidden and overlooked value-cost-effort of stay-at-home mums and that working mums (well…all women) on average make only 82 cents  for every dollar earned by men.

Christine Carter articulates these frustrations well in her piece: All I want for Mother’s Day is an equitable division of labour. Wanted to synthesis some facts into the post AND source more widely (ie not only read academic lit) AND get some mums voices in here. I’m hyperconscious that I’m not a mother, so am only presenting my POV on gender issues – not commenting on what it is like to BE a mum as that is not my direct, personal lived experience so I don’t feel comfortable commenting on that – so I made a point to look for mums who have written on this topic and found this great article on emotional labor. It fit in beautifully. So funny – I had a conversation with a dear friend on this very topic…I think I’ll flip her this link as well! And yes… it is ‘a thing’…still!

With much work needed to address these systemic gender inequities, Mother’s Day is an opportunity to recognise these issues and celebrate mums and other female carers.

Traditionally, this means breakfast in bed, flowers, or lunches out with loved ones. link back here to ‘presents’ and conventional Mother’s Day approaches to lead into my final takeaway idea/content.

For cycling mums, it’s an opportunity to think more thoughtfully about the cycling presence and presents we give to mums and what these ‘gifts’ communicate, expect and perpetuate.

As I was writing this post, I’ve changed the title a few times. The changes reflect the different ‘moves’ I went through in writing the content – so in the spirit of transparent disruption – I am including that process here as well. It was at this stage of writing the post that I looked a the title and thought: ‘that title doesn’t fit anymore. The following section is a brief behind the scene thinking-editing-doing that went on at this stage. For reading ease I have not super-scripted this section despite it all being thinking-writing-as-process content.

I like the image above. It presents a not blond, white mum(gender?) House is a little messy and not presenting a ‘perfectly’ curated photo/family and the black LHS is suggestive of the ‘dark side’ of family life – fits well with overall post themes. It also helps break up blog content and helps separate the next section which is a new and different idea/focus.

Title: re-writing and re-righting

Initially the title was: Mother’s Day – more thoughtful presents, please!

It was tight and communicated the initial content main ideas. But it only named the ‘presents’ aspect, which was a very minor idea and didn’t fully capture the relational, non-commercial call to action I was putting forward.

So the next edit was: Mother’s Day – more thoughtful presents and presence, please!

I liked the homonym and alliteration of presents and presence – it fitted well with what I wanted to highlight. I looked at the order of the two keywords ‘presents’ and ‘presence’ and wonder how changing their placement might change the impact of the meaning of my overall message. I swapped them around to see that changed. I wanted to start with the known (presents) and end/lead into the blog main idea (presence) – so that was the final word order I chose.

Then: Mother’s Day – more thoughtful presence and presents, please!

I looked at the: , please. It is polite. Too polite. I took it out. I was pandering to social mores that dictate women should be polite, not cause trouble or be bothersome…pandering to people-pleasing? As Gemma Hartley says, mums are ‘just fed up’ and what is needed (and most wanted) is a ‘deep clean.

So I removed the: , please. It is a stronger statement – declarative and instructional, not a request and thus leaving open the final decision as to whether to act on this ‘request’ or not to other-than-the-mother-saying it .

Note to self: remove (more): , please(s).

Apply liberally – in general and elsewhere.

So then it was: Mother’s Day – more thoughtful presence and presents!

This was closer to the sentiment I wanted to convey. It is short and punchy and fits into (no more than) two lines of text as a heading – which is a good ‘grab’ for the WordPress RHS margin widget ‘Recent Posts’. The exclamation mark as an end made it read more of an imperative – but perhaps a little shouty – so I removed it. But then it was left hanging. I also wanted to give some notice as to the type of presentation/format this also helps with search features later on So I added: (Disruptive Edit) at the end. I added ‘Give’ at the start as I wanted to include mention of the action that was the crux of the post giving is a nice thing to do! I wanted the title to include someone doing something – and it read-felt much better with ‘give’. Then I stopped. gotta know when to stop! send it out now – share your process work, resist being ‘correct’ ‘right’ and ‘good’ just get it out there – it is in-process and raw so no more tinkering!

Final title: Mother’s Day: Give more thoughtful presence and presents (Disruptive Edit)

..then finish the blog content and close on a positive!

Interesting to note that WordPress backend drafting notifications (like the readability analysis, SEO, suggested ‘revisions’) are going crazy pining me to check and recheck. I have a list of sad red face emojis letting me know NEEDS IMPROVEMENT! – its the algorithm reminding me that this type of post ‘won’t work’ and is ‘not normal’ writing and formatting. I am ingoring them all.

(*PHEW*)

…and that dear reader is a little sneak-peak into some of the in-process ideas, considerations and edits that happen during the construction of blog posts!

Thanks for coming a long for this experimental ride into a disruptive edit!

Stay amazing and see you next time.

 

New Materialisms SIG: Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies

New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
Image: Rebecca Olive

We are very excited to have Dr. Rebecca Olive as guest presenter for our April NM SIG!

Sport as encounter: Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies

Rebecca Olive is an ARC DECRA Fellow in the School of Human Movement & Nutrition Sciences at UQ.

Her project, Moving Oceans, examines the role of sport (surfing and ocean swimming) in shaping peoples’ relationships to coastal and ocean ecologies.

See more of Rebecca’s publications here.

This session: Key to addressing human impacts on climate change is changing human demands on ecologies. My project is exploring how participating in ocean sports shapes peoples’ relationships to and knowledge of ecologies, and their ways of thinking about our responsibilities for environmental care (Olive). In particular, this project is aimed at challenging white-settler relationships to place (Kimmerer, Kwaymullina), and the ontologies that underpin how we understand ourselves in relation to the world.

Swimming and surfing remind us in deeply personal ways that we are part of ecologies, not separate from them. This includes learning to make kin (Haraway) with threatening aspects of place and space, such as sharks and various forms of pollution (Tsing).

For this discussion, I have suggested a lot of quite short readings, often from much longer texts. I have also set a recent essay that gives a good overview of my current work. You might not get to them all, but reading across at least a few of them will be helpful.

As part of this meeting, we dicussed: How can we better communicate knowledge with relevant communities and the public? 

New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
Image: Rebecca Olive

My session notes and thoughts

Below are two worldings I wrote about this session to give sense of what emerged.

Nature returns revisited

We’re discussing nature revisited and tainted returns. I’m traversing Ecofeminisms and thinking in habit(at)s. ‘Proper’ places. Sarah Jaquette posits climate anxiety is a white-person’s phenomenon. A culture of denial. Our vulnerability offsets our humility. Confusion about Margaret Howe Lovatt and Peter the dolphin’s more-than-pleasurable interspecies relations. People actively speaking about creative connections and kinships beyond family and humanness. Healing traditions. Tsing’s challenge of ‘living in the precarious ruins’. Reassuring exclusionary ethical participation. Hydrofeminisms. Definitions and distinctions between ‘locals’ and ‘imports’. PolesApart. Activists, stewards, custodians, collectors. Val Plumwood resituates humans in ecological terms. Putting humans back on the inside of nature.

Surfing ontological waves

I’m considering Rebecca Olive’s work. Surfing intensities. Reflecting on human impacted climate change and changing human demands on ecologies. Briny netroot polemics. Explorations of environs question peoples’ relationships, knowledge and responsibilities of ecologies and environmental care. Transnatural perspectives. Much needed challenges of white-settler relationships to place and the ontologies of how we understand ourselves and our actions in relation to the world. Moving Oceans. Natural environments affect us in deeply personal ways. Making kin. We are ecologies-with, not ecologies-from. Facing fears. Choices that either support or threaten ourselves, each other, creatures, plants and environments. The benefits of swimming with sharks.

  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG. Making kin with ocean and coastal ecologies. Bicycles Create Change.com. 27th April 2021.

Readings

Olive, R. (2020). Living with sharks, White Horses, 34, available at: https://movingoceans.com/2020/11/26/living-with-sharks/

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

  • Making kin: Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene (pp. 99-103).

Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions.

  • The gift of strawberries, (pp. 22-32).

Kwaymullina, A. (2018). You are on Indigenous land: Ecofeminism, Indigenous peoples and land justice. In L. Stevens, P. Tait, & D. Varney (Eds.) Feminist Ecologies (pp. 193-208). Palgrave Macmillan.

Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press.

  • Prologue: Autumn Aroma (p. 1-9)
  • Arts of noticing (p. 17-25)

A ‘mind-reading’ e-bike

‘Thought control’ bicycle for spinal injury rehab. Bicycles Create Change.com 16th July, 2019.

Innovative technology is increasingly being applied to bike riding to address some very pressing issues, such as increasing bike participation and rider safety.

Previously I’ve posted on the pioneering work of Griffith researchers working on the world’s first ‘thought-control’ bicycle for spinal injury rehab (see more here). This story details Dr. Dinesh Palipana who is a Griffith University medical graduate. Dinesh became a quadriplegic after a car accident partway through his medical degree. Despite this, Dinesh completed his degree and has since been collaborating with a Griffith research team on the world’s-first integrated neuro-musculoskeletal rehabilitation recline bike that will enable quadriplegics to use ‘thought control’ to ride a specially adapted bike. This project uses ground-breaking 3D computer-simulated biomechanical model, connected to an electroencephalogram (EEG) to capture Dinesh’s brainwaves that then stimulates movement that not only push the pedals for him but also helps revitalise is neuro pathways for eventually recovery.

I recently came across an article written last year by Timna Jacks for the Sydney Morning Herald that looked at a ‘mind-reading- bicycle designed to save lives by improving riders’ safety. I was particularly curious about this article as the researchers were using e-bikes in this case Timna makes links with the unprecedented surge in bike use due to COVID-19 – something we have all noticed. So, if you missed this article, I’ve included it in full below.

A ‘mind-reading’ e-bike. Bicycles Create Change.com. 22nd April 2021.

The ‘mind-reading’ bicycle that could save lives

Cycling in Melbourne might seem a dangerous game, but what if the bike was so intuitive that it could detect when you were in danger and manoeuvre you to safety?

Researchers at Monash University, IBM Australia and the University of Southampton in the UK have invented an e-bicycle which they claim can “read” people’s minds and detect when a cyclist is in danger.

The electroencephalogram-supported e-bike prototype, built by the researchers over more than a year, scans the electrical activity in the cyclist’s brain to detect the nature of the rider’s field of view.

An EEG electrode cap measuring electrical signals in the cyclist’s occipital lobe, the visual processing area of the brain, feeds into a small computer in their backpack, which converts the signals from brain activity to instructions for the bike’s engine.

A ‘mind-reading’ e-bike. Bicycles Create Change.com. 22nd April 2021.

If the rider’s peripheral vision is narrow – a neurological response when a cyclist detects a danger ahead such as a car cutting them off or an obstruction to a bike path – the bike’s accelerator halts. The cyclist can still move forward by pushing the pedals, albeit more slowly.

Conversely, if the rider has a wide peripheral vision because there is no threat in sight, the bike accelerates.

Changes in peripheral awareness are often linked to a person’s awareness of their surroundings, and their physical performance and co-ordination.

Researchers at Monash, IBM and University of Southampton Josh Andres said cycling accidents often occurred at intersections where cyclists needed a heightened awareness of their environment.

He wanted to find a technology that gave riders extra time in critical situations, but instead of outsourcing this skill, he wanted to build a technology that helped riders connect more with their bodies.

This e-bike, named Ena, would provide a feedback loop for cyclists, enabling them to improve their peripheral vision.

“This is a problem right now. Many of the technologies we are building are teaching us how to outsource how we feel, whereas we should try to be more in touch with our bodies, more in tune with our bodies,” Mr Andres said.

He has previously built e-bikes that connect the bike’s motor to traffic light signals and instruct the cyclist to speed up or slow down.

Monash University researcher Floyd Mueller said the new bike was aimed at boosting people’s confidence in cycling, allowing them to feel in control.

A ‘mind-reading’ e-bike. Bicycles Create Change.com. 22nd April 2021.

“We know from good cyclists that they talk about how they become one with the bike … what this technology allows is for the cyclist to be an extension of their body. The bike knows when the cyclist is in danger or having fun without being explicitly told.”

Cycling is having an unprecedented surge in popularity because of the COVID-19 lockdown. A Bicycle Network count of 8800 riders on April 25 showed the number had increased by 270 per cent compared with November last year.

But Uber this week confirmed that its shared e-bike outfit Jump would be taken over by Lime and pulled off Melbourne’s streets, in line with similar moves overseas.

The program launched in early March and paused three weeks later as COVID-19 lockdowns began.

It is understood the decision was made in the face of financial strain wrought by the virus, with the company reportedly expected to lay off more than 100 Australian employees as part of its major global job cuts.

ICQI 2021 Accepted! Velo-onto-epistemology: Becoming(s)-with Bicycles, Gender, Education and Research

ICQI 2021 Accepted! Velo-onto-epistemology: Becoming(s)-with Bicycles, Gender, Education and Research. Bicycles Create Change.com. 14th April 2021.
Image: aspri.org.au

ICQI 2021: Collaborative Futures in Qualitative Inquiry

ICQI…..you know….only the largest ……. and most respected qualitative research conference IN THE WORLD! … and with all the biggest names!

My PhD supervisor said I should consider submitting an abstract for this conference.

Doing so is a VERY BIG DEAL – this congress is the pinnacle in my field. I’ve never presented at this conference.

For the first time ever, the ICQI 2021 will be held online. This is a super attractive feature for me as it will mean if I get an abstract accepted to present, I wouldn’t have to spend the extra money to travel to the USA as was required for all previous (and probably subsequent) ICQIs. If I ever wanted to give ICQI a solid shot – this is it!

So I did – and my abstract got accepted! Woohoo!

ICQI 2021 Accepted! Velo-onto-epistemology: Becoming(s)-with Bicycles, Gender, Education and Research. Bicycles Create Change.com. 14th April 2021.

My ICQI 2021 Abstract

Velo-onto-epistemology: Becoming(s)-with Bicycles, Gender, Education and Research.
This paper traces some experimental and experiential wonderings of researching gendered journeys on bicycles in West Africa. This session shares what is unfolding for one rider-researcher as she works to excavate the entanglements, tensions and possibilities of becoming(s)-with post-qualitative inquiry that foregrounds African landscapes, smells, desires, dynamics, beliefs, practices and peoples with emerging feminist posthuman ontologies. My research puts to work feminist New Materialisms to explore how bicycles feature in West African girls’ access to secondary education. This undertaking is bold, complex and unsettling. It requires (re)turning (Barad, 2006) and challenging habitual preoccupations about bicycles, embodiment, movement, identity, ecology, sp/pl/p/ace and methodology. There is much about gendered bodies navigating trails that commands attention, yet defies explanation (McLure, 2013). Drawing on key encounters experienced in Brisbane (Australia) and Lunsar (Sierra Leone), I trace the skills, wills, spills and thrills from which a velo-onto-epistemology is emerging.

ICQI 2021 Accepted! Velo-onto-epistemology: Becoming(s)-with Bicycles, Gender, Education and Research. Bicycles Create Change.com. 14th April 2021.
Image: aspri.org.au

Below are some ICQI 2021 details to get a sense of what’s on offer.

The 2021 Congress theme is: Collaborative Futures in Qualitative Inquiry.

The rapidly changing social, cultural, political, economic, and technological dynamics brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic are inescapable as we endeavor to move forward. The pandemic has also amplified hard truths about everyday life: the ongoing historical devaluation of teachers, nurses, and service workers, and the precarity of the working classes, the unyielding privileging of business and the free market as the answer to all social and health ills, the differential experience of the virus relative to race, class, and gender dynamics, including as related to co-morbidity and mortality rates, access to care, and visibility, the rise of right-wing populism and its deleterious impact on positive governmental responses to pandemic conditions, the prominence of conspiracy theories in mainstream and social media discourse (e.g., masks don’t help, virus is man-made, etc.).

At the same time, we cannot overlook the broader context in which the 2021 Congress will take place: Black Lives Matter, #MeToo creeping authoritarianism, environmental crises, economic shocks to higher education and continuing public health crises.

Collectively and collaboratively, this moment calls for a critical, performative, social justice inquiry directed at the multiple crises of our historical present.

We need a rethinking of where we have been, and, critically, where we are going. 

We cannot go at it alone.

We need to imagine new ways to collaborate, to engage in research and activism. New ways of representing and intervening into the historical present. New ways to conduct research, and a rethinking of in whose interest our research benefits.

Sessions in the 2021 Congress will take up these topics, as well as those related to and/or utilizing:

  • feminist inquiry
  • Critical Race Theory
  • intersectionality
  • queer theory
  • critical disability research
  • phenomenology
  • Indigenous methodologies
  • postcolonial and decolonized knowing
  • poststructural engagements
  • diffraction and intra-action
  • digital methodologies
  • autoethnography
  • visual methodologies
  • thematic analysis
  • performance
  • art as research
  • critical participatory action research
  • multivocality
  • collaborative inquiry
  • ………..and the politics of evidence.

Sessions will also discuss:

  • threats to shared governance
  • attacks on freedom of speech
  • public policy discourse
  • and research as resistance

Scholars come to the Congress to resist, to celebrate community, to experiment with traditional and new methodologies, with new technologies of representation.

Together we seek to develop guidelines and exemplars concerning advocacy, inquiry and social justice concerns. We share a commitment to change the world, to engage in ethical work that makes a positive difference.

As critical scholars, our task is to bring the past and the future into the present, allowing us to engage realistic utopian pedagogies of hope.

ICQI provides leadership to demonstrate the promise of qualitative inquiry as a form of democratic practice, to show how qualitative inquiry can be used to directly engage pressing social issues at the level of local, state, national and global communities. 

The Congress sponsors the journal International Review of Qualitative Research (IRQR), three book series, and occasional publications based upon the more than 1,000 papers given at the conference each year. It the largest annual gathering of qualitative scholars in the world.

New Materialisms SIG: How to work with and ‘write-up’ ‘data’.

New Materialisms SIG: How to work with and 'write-up' 'data'. Bicycles Create Change.com. 30th March 2021.
Source: Synth Westwood. Work by Neil J. Rook.

Hooray! Finally!

Our New Materialisms (NM) Special Interest Group (SIG) is back on!

The March NM SIG is our first meeting back for 2021. I’m so happy!

Because we are reconvening after the New Year break, we wanted to offer the opportunity for participants to reconnect more directly. So instead of going straight into guest presentations, we decided to have a writing-process open forum to ‘warm-up’ our ideas, discussion and writing-with NM approaches.

So, in this session, we gave breathing space for a topic we all wrestle with:  how to ‘write up’ or ‘present’ New Materialisms research. 

We invited participants to bring a piece of writing/data/something you are working on to share.

This NM forum encouraged cross-pollination, stimulate new ideas, spark some inspiration, offered some new skills and probed what im/possibilities might emerge for stretching your NM research writing-data.

In this meeting, we asked: How might researchers who are working with New Materialisms ‘write up data’?

We had two readings to get the juices flowing.

Readings:

Somerville, M. (2016) The post-human I: encountering ‘data’ in new materialism, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29:9, 1161-1172, DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2016.1201611 

Niccolini, A. D., Zarabadi, S., & Ringrose, J. (2018). Spinning yarns: Affective kinshipping as posthuman pedagogy. Parallax (Leeds, England), 24(3), 324-343. 

New Materialisms SIG: How to work with and 'write-up' 'data'. Bicycles Create Change.com. 30th March 2021.
5 mins warm-up: Delicious Research(er)s. NM SIG March 2021.

March NM SIG notes

Our warm-up NM writing activity was on: Delicious research(er)s. I developed my Delicious Research(er)s warm-up into a 25mins, 100-word worlding – and this is what emerged:

Delicious research(er)s.

Delicious research(er)ing is an open-ended kitchette of inquisitiveness, capabilities, ingredients and alchemy. Folding, passing, mixing and blending: foundational blisters pop into syrupy-sweet intellectual nectar. Flavour(ful) data fragments over tongues, in eyes, and on minds. Delicious researchers are lightning rods for the unexplained. They stand tall: chins up, ears swivelling, noses twitching, eyes roving and skin electrified with buzzing intensity. They dive deep into salty pedogological soups, spin with umami-rolled embodiment, and languish in astringent-infused relationalities of common wor(l)ds. Delicious researchers are sexy, amorous, desirable and magnetic, heated yet ‘cool’ – and prone to spontaneously combust in moments of exquisite flambé rupture.

See images below for some of our other NM lines of flight.

  • New Materialisms SIG: How to work with and 'write-up' 'data'. Bicycles Create Change.com. 30th March 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG: How to work with and 'write-up' 'data'. Bicycles Create Change.com. 30th March 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG: How to work with and 'write-up' 'data'. Bicycles Create Change.com. 30th March 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG: How to work with and 'write-up' 'data'. Bicycles Create Change.com. 30th March 2021.
  • New Materialisms SIG: How to work with and 'write-up' 'data'. Bicycles Create Change.com. 30th March 2021.